The PAPPG; at 145-146; states that for alternative procedures projects; the applicant may submit an appeal only for insurance or corrective actions resulting from reviews such as an audit. FEMA denial of the Applicant request to extend the deadline to submit an excess funds PAAP DAC proposal does not fall within the appealable actions outlined in FEMA policy. Additionally; the Applicant signed an Agreement for Participation; which included a stipulation that appeal rights pertained to deobligations resulting from specifically delineated determinations. Therefore; the time extension denial at issue is not appealable.FEMA finds that the Applicant did not have an agreed-upon proposal for the use of PAAP DAC excess funds within 180 days of the latest period of performance. Furthermore; the denial of a request to extend the deadline to submit a proposal to use excess PAAP DAC funds is not an appealable action under FEMA policy. Therefore; this appeal is denied.

HeadnotesThe PAPPG; at 145-146; states that for alternative procedures projects; the applicant may submit an appeal only for insurance or corrective actions resulting from reviews such as an audit. FEMA’s denial of the Applicant’s request to extend the deadline to submit an excess funds PAAP DAC proposal does not fall within the appealable actions outlined in FEMA policy. Additionally; the Applicant signed an Agreement for Participation; which included a stipulation that appeal rights pertained to deobligations resulting from specifically delineated determinations. Therefore; the time extension denial at issue is not appealable.ConclusionFEMA finds that the Applicant did not have an agreed-upon proposal for the use of PAAP DAC excess funds within 180 days of the latest period of performance. Furthermore; the denial of a request to extend the deadline to submit a proposal to use excess PAAP DAC funds is not an appealable action under FEMA policy. Therefore; this appeal is denied.