Procurement
Procurement & Contracting Requirements – Allowable & Reasonable Costs – Duplication of Benefits – Mold Remediation
Stuart Hall School for Boys
<<RETURN

44 C.F.R. 13.36 required competitive bids for every procurement action; unless one of four exceptions apply; including public exigency.Here; the mold remediation met the “public exigency” exception in 44 C.F.R. 13.36(d)(4)(i)(B). Even if a procurement exception applies; per 44 C.F.R. § 13.36(d)(4)(ii) and13.36(f)(1); an applicant must still conduct a concurrent cost or price analysis to determine whether the contract costs are reasonable. Neither the Applicant nor the Grantee performed such an analysis until submission of the first appeal. FEMA therefore correctly found that a procurement violation existed.

Procurement & Contracting Requirements, Allowable & Reasonable Costs, Duplication of Benefits, Mold Remediation
2020

Headnotes44 C.F.R. § 13.36 required competitive bids for every procurement action; unless one of four exceptions apply; including public exigency.Here; the mold remediation met the “public exigency” exception in 44 C.F.R. § 13.36(d)(4)(i)(B). Even if a procurement exception applies; per 44 C.F.R. §§ 13.36(d)(4)(ii) and13.36(f)(1); an applicant must still conduct a concurrent cost or price analysis to determine whether the contract costs are reasonable. Neither the Applicant nor the Grantee performed such an analysis until submission of the first appeal. FEMA therefore correctly found that a procurement violation existed.

<<Open FEMA PA Appeal Link